Menu
Log in

 

Login

Log in


Understanding Citations Through Disciplinary Values

Emily Forcier, Metropolitan State University of Denver
Melody Denny, St. Lawrence University

abstract

This lesson on citation starts with the concept of disciplinary values and the ways that disciplines create and build knowledge, including how they use citation. First, it asks tutors to reflect on their own experiences in classes and within their majors when working with source material and citations. After that paired work, tutors complete an annotation activity with two articles, written in different citation styles, looking at how and where the authors of those pieces used citation. The lesson concludes with a large group discussion of what tutors know from experience, what they learned from the annotation activity, and how they can apply disciplinary knowledge in tutoring sessions to demystify citation and guide students to understanding its purpose.



KEYWORDS

In-person tutoring
Instructional feedback/approaches
Sentence-level/lower-order/lower gravity concerns
Writing in the disciplines/writing across the curriculum


LESSON OVERVIEW

We we often hear in tutorials that students (and sometimes our tutors) think of citation as “jumping through hoops” and are overly focused on format. We wanted to shift our tutors’ focus from thinking of citation as a “necessary evil” to thinking of it more as a way to signal membership in a discipline. Therefore, this lesson aims to teach tutors how to read rhetorically for the lower-order concerns, or rules-based concerns, of citations and citation styles, and to connect this information to disciplinary values (Barney, 2016; Smith, 2007; Thonney, 2011). Even if a student just wants to know what to cite and how, we feel that reframing this discussion is important for both tutors and students. 

The theoretical grounding for this lesson includes discourse communities (Swales, 2017), examining disciplinary values (Adler-Kassner & Wardle, 2022), writing in the disciplines, and transferring writing skills and knowledge across the curriculum (Thonney, 2011). Because "academic citation practices contribute to the construction of disciplinary knowledge" (Hyland, 1999), tutors will focus on the lower-order concerns of MLA and APA citation styles by identifying four components: in-text citations, signal phrases, narrative and/or parenthetical citations, and stacking citations (Mueller, 2005; Hyland 1999) in an annotation activity. 

In our experience, students and tutors have found this approach to teaching citation styles helpful. Components of this lesson have been used at different points in the semester for staff meetings, included a mix of returning tutors and new tutors, and has served as a nice citation refresher. Additionally, we noticed tutors’ talk around citation shifted to the why of citation instead of the how

Learning outcomes for this lesson plan include tutors understanding the larger idea of disciplinarity, disciplinary values, exploring their own knowledge base in certain disciplines and citation styles, and preparing  to work with a variety of disciplines and citation styles. By unlocking some of tutors’ experiential knowledge from their own coursework and by asking them to read sources more rhetorically, we can prepare them to work with citations beyond formatting.

Adler-Kassner, L., & Wardle, E. (2022). Writing expertise: A research-based approach to writing and learning across disciplines. The WAC clearinghouse, University Press of Colorado. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/expertise/approach.pdf 

Barney, B. T. (2016). HOCs and LOCs and even some MOCs: Using order of concerns to draft, review, revise, be graded, and think. Open english @ SLCC. https://slcc.pressbooks.pub/openenglishatslcc/chapter/hocs-and-locs-and-even-some-mocs-using-order-of-concerns-to-draft-review-revise-be-graded-and-think/

Bunn, M. (2015). How to read like a writer. Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Vol. 2). https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/writingspaces2/bunn--how-to-read.pdf 

Harrington, S. (2017). Citing sources is a kill learned early on. In Cheryl E. Ball & Drew M Loewe (Ed.), Bad ideas about writing (pp. 242-246). West Virginia University Libraries. https://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu/badideas/badideasaboutwriting-book.pdf

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341 

Lumen Learning. (n.d.). Exploring academic disciplines. College Writing Handbook https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-jeffersoncc-styleguide/chapter/exploring-academic-disciplines/

Melzer, D. (2020). Understanding discourse communities. Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Volume 3). https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/writingspaces3/melzer.pdf  

Mueller, S. (2005). Documentation style and discipline-specific values. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 29(6), 6–9. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/wln/v29/29.6.pdf 

Smith, G.A. (2007). Documentation style as rhetorical device: A comparative analysis of two bibliographic systems. Faculty publications and presentations, (Vol. 26). https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lib_fac_pubs/26?utm_source=digitalcommons.liberty.edu%2Flib_fac_pubs%2F26&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages 

Thonney, T. (2011). Teaching the conventions of academic discourse. Teaching English at the Two-Year College, 38(4), 347–362. 


FORMAT TYPE

In-person
Online synchronous
Hands-on activity


TIMING & OCCURRENCE

Lesson Time: 30-60 minutes
Prep Time: 15-30 minutes
Occurrence:  Session (designed to happen once)
Timeline: 
Continued education/professional development (located in a later term of experienced tutors' employment)
Training Type: Stand-alone training


TUTOR AUDIENCE 

Novice tutors
Experienced tutors
Undergraduate student tutors
Graduate student tutors
In-person tutors
Synchronous online tutors


MATERIALS NEEDED
    • Text assigned to tutors to read beforehand: Mueller, S. (2005). Documentation style and discipline-specific values. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 29(6), 6–9. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/wln/v29/29.6.pdf 
    • Example academic articles printed or digital. Feel free to use your own, perhaps from previous trainings or meetings, or we’ve provided bibliographic information of articles to use
    • A whiteboard, chalkboard, etc., anything where the facilitator can create a large visual to create a chart for comparing and contrasting. If you are conducting this training online, or in a hybrid mix, you can open a document, create a table, and share your screen for a visual.
    • Note: When considering certain citations and citation styles, provide and examine examples of the genres tutors/students are trying to produce. For example, we used Literature Reviews, first, because they provide ample citations for analysis and, second, because our tutors work with literature reviews frequently in tutorials. It’s also a good reminder of how different disciplines “do” genres differently. On that note, if the facilitator has access to sample student papers, those samples could be good exemplars to work with in this session.




      CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE LESSON PLAN MATERIALS



      AUTHOR INFORMATION

      Emily Forcier, Metropolitan State University of Denver 

      emforcier@msu.edu

      Emily Forcier is a lecturer and the assistant writing program administrator of first-year writing at Metropolitan State University of Denver. Her research consists of writing center administration, tutor training curriculum, and first-year writing pedagogy.


      Melody Denny, St. Lawrence University
      mdenny@stlawu.edu

      Melody Denny is the WORD Studio Director at St. Lawrence University. Her research focuses on writing center discourse, writing center administration, first-year writing, writing across the curriculum, and, more recently, AI. 


      Follow our activities

      © Wild Apricot teachers association. 

      Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software